• PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Anyone who has to use Windows and suffers this, PowerToys is your friend. Locksmith identifies what’s locking your file and allows you to free it up. Dunno why PowerToys isn’t bundled by default tbh.

    • ProfessorProteus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dunno why PowerToys isn’t bundled by default tbh.

      PowerToys give the user more power, which goes directly against Microsoft’s own goal.

      Also, less seriously, “toys” implies the user might enjoy the experience, and you know they can’t let that happen.

      • alqloe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        2 years ago

        Shut up. It is literally made by Microsoft. As a place to experiment what to include in Windows. Don’t argue with strawmen

        • danc4498
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Shut up. I also think power toys that feature basic functionality and have been around for decades should be included in Windows. I can’t always install this on a computer that needs it.

          • Caboose12000
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 years ago

            Shut up. I agree with you it should be included in windows, I just wanted to feel included

          • Agent641
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            I was using image resizer for years before Microsoft meddled with it. Why is it slow to start up now?!

        • dlpkl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s a Linux circlejerk community, what did you expect?

    • errer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 years ago

      Cause they’re too busy finding new ways to bundle ads.

      • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Psexec can be pretty dangerous. Psexec.exe -i -s gives you access to the NTAUTHORITY/SYSTEM account, which is higher than Administrator. One time at work I was trying to do something and was getting permission denied so I decided to use that to get around the problem, I got to spend the afternoon talking to our security administrator because he got a bunch of alerts from our antivirus.

        • surewhynotlem
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well that was the mistake. The first thing you do with SYSTEM is disable the security software.

        • elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Never thought about that, but since these tools just work, when you copy them to your PC… how does psexec do that? It’d either need you to be an administrator (and then it’s not really a privilege escalation as you could have registered any program into the task scheduler or as a service to run as SYSTEM) or it’d need a delegate service, that should only be available when you use an installer - which again wasn’t was has been done when just copying the tool.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You need Administrative permissions for psexec. It uploads a file to the target computer’s \admin$ share (just C:\Windows) and starts a service to execute it. Services run as SYSTEM so that’s why you get those privileges.

            (Hah, I forgot your message while typing mine and just copied you :)

            Edit: fixed c$ to admin$

            • elvith@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I found a blog post outlining exactly that. If you use it locally, it will install and start a service temporarily. That service runs as SYSTEM and invokes your command. To succeed, you need to be a local administrator.

              If you try the same remote, it tries to access \\remote-server-ip\$admin and installs the service with that. To succeed your current account on your local machine must exist on the remote machine and must be an administrator there.

              So in short: It only works, if you’ve already the privilege to do so and the tool itself is not (ab)using a privilege escalation or something like that. Any hacker and virus may do the very same and doesn’t need psexec - it’s just easier for them to use that tool.

              • 0xD@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Thank you for clearing it up!

                And regarding your assessment: Exactly!

    • kuneho
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I recently discovered Resource Monitor (resmon) can do that, too!

      I was using Unlocker waaaay back, I loved it. Since then I wasn’t looking for alternatives, but since resmon also can do that, it’s more than enough.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because it’s still in development, but afaik it is the goal to include it once it’s stable.

    • Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I always thought it wasn’t included by default to mitigate malware damage to a system. Malware needs to be just a little bit more advanced if it can’t hijack Powertools to do what it wants

    • Brkdncr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      They definitely don’t go through the same amount of QA as other apps.

    • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 years ago

      Nowadays it would be $19.99 per month and it’s a one year contract that renews three months before expiration.

      • Olmai
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        And you lose the 3 months if you cancel before renewal

  • Bassman1805
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    My first attempt at running Arch, I managed to fuck it up so badly that I had to write a script to write zeros to every bit of my HDD. Fun times.

      • Bassman1805
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Honestly don’t even remember, but it was in my peak “know enough to be dangerous” days in college. I almost certainly didn’t have to go that nuclear to fix it, but that’s what I did.

        Take 2 of Arch, after that wipe was completed, went pretty well. It revived an old piece of shit laptop for another few years before its motherboard gave out.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’ll wager guess it was something to do with confusing GPT and MBR partitioning. There was a time where some BIOSs and loaders only understood or preferred one over the other, leading to weird incongruences depending on what you’re using to look at the disk. You have to actually overwrite the partition tables to get a clean start.

    • Serinus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it asks “Are you sure?” now first.

    • Stupidmanager
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      ‘rm -rf /*’ for the win. I was on a production system when I learned I used that combo far too much. Thankfully, lots were deleted and my crimes were never detected.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 years ago

    Inodes can be kept active by unlinked filehandles, a fun way to spend a afternoon figuring out where all the space went.

        • Strider
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          While having killall is nice, I didn’t have many use cases with it, administering Linux privately and for corporations in around 2 decades.

          But that’s just me 😀

          • optional@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s because the Gnu/Linux-Version of killall is as weak as a stoned penguin. You have to try the real stuff.

  • JayObey711
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile chromeOS had a stroke because I asked to set a wallpaper

    • merthyr1831
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 years ago

      ChromeOS is so funny because it’s either way too anal about what you can do or there’s a part they forgot to harden against end users and the power of linux spews forth with endless destructive potential

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Windows, too. Turns out, there’s a hard-coded image size limit. If you’ve got a ~5k screen or bigger, or equivalent size virtual desktop with multiple monitors - you gotta find a way to compress it below limit. Nope, webp is not accepted, even though it is perfectly capable of using it.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 years ago

    Had a call to sort an issue where someone couldn’t open an excel file because they already had it open don’t know why that needed a warning over a simple window switch to the sheet they wanted but hey stopped me doing what I was doing for nothing

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah, needing to use Microsoft Office for everything at work is a damn pain. This one time I am trying to close Word, but then I must have clicked the top right X one too many times so the “You can’t close Word until the Closing… dialog is dismissed” dialog pops up, which itself interrupts the Closing dialog…

      Screen photo

      • Buddahriffic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I lost a lot of respect for Microsoft when I first saw that issue. It’s such an easy to avoid limitation. Like probably a similar level of difficulty to remove that limitation than to write the error message explaining it, unless it’s more of a spaghetti mess than I’m expecting it to be.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s to do with the ability to work with data across all open workbooks:

          You can reference [Workbook.xlsx]Sheet1!B2 but if you have two excel workbooks open, both named Workbook.xlsx which one should be used?

          • Buddahriffic
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            If you want to reference other files, you should use a less ambiguous way to refer to them. Like a relative path or full absolute path. The fact that that weakness is because of a half-baked feature like that actually makes me lose even more respect.

            Edit: thanks for the info though, it does add some missing context.

          • Morphit @feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Whichever one has the smallest relative path to the workbook using it? How does it find the workbook if it isn’t open already?

          • psud
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            So throw an error at runtime on that macro, most workbooks aren’t the target of a macro

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Hello, yes, IT department? I think my co-worker’s keyboard is missing all their punctuation marks. Yes, it’s making communication very difficult.”

        • NoFun4You
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          What lol, are you trying to say a modern browser that can read pdfs is bloat? Lol

            • NoFun4You
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I was expecting a terminal command to parse your pdfs lol

              • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                To be honest I do not like PDF readers being bundled in browser’s binaries, I see web rendering engines themselfs as a pile of legacy impossible to rewrite spaghetti.
                Qutebrowser for example has PDF.js as an optional, installable dependency. I guess Firefox can be recompiled without PDF support, if someone wants to save those… 3MB. But just that my Linux mind has slight aversion to bundling stuff in single binary, because on Linux installing 1 or 100 programs if they are packaged takes the same time.

                Ah. And some commands for PDFs are really useful :P.
                For example I used convert file.jpg file.pdf to upload couple of documents I had scanned as pictures but website required a PDF extension.

                • NoFun4You
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Nice.

                  The question I have is does tesseract do better OCR on pdfs than chat GPT lol

                  Also obligatory fuck Adobe.

        • NoFun4You
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Why? What does it do over a built in browser pdf reader

  • ricdeh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    The Tux reminds me of playing Super Tux Kart today… I really hate that GIMP mascot now,

  • ddkman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is funny, because copying files to a USB flashdrive, is just inherently disfunctional in linux.

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Hang on there is a sync option? Does that make the progressbar work? If so why is it not enabled?

        • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep. Almost all operating systems have a bufor that tell programs file was moved when it is still in the process. It makes perfect sense, it speed things up and extends the lifespan of the device.

          You can flush that bufor manually with just the sync command or disable it for whole partition with -o sync option. Technically you should unmount drives before unplugging for safety anyway, but people are stupid or more important lazy and in my opinion for external devices mounting with sync really should be the default. Maybe some low-level developer would disagree.

          • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m very confused by this thread.

            Progress bars are handled by the applications themselves, whether flushing happens or not;

            immediate flushing does not increase storage lifespan, in fact letting the OS decide when to do it may allow wear-leveling to work better.

            (Though, IMO immediate flushing should be the default for removable media on user-friendly distributions, like swap partitions are)

            • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Progress bars are handled by the applications themselves

              Yes, but OS must tell the application how much of the operation is done

              immediate flushing does not increase storage lifespan

              I was trying to say the opposite. Caching/buffering is what longers the lifespan and can speed system up

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        To be fair in the other direction. Debian and Ubuntu and forks have it. They handle pretty much all filesystems fine, which is indeed impressive. Suprisingly Windows also has pretty good EXT drivers, so in a way the world is in harmony :D .