• squaresinger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Wasn’t the word motonormativity from you? I had to re-read that word a few times to get what you were saying with it and it’s good.

        sunzu2 called it a slur, and a good one at that.

        • [email protected]@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          I wish I was that clever, but no. It’s from a researcher named Ian Walker, coined in a very interesting article. It has its own Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motonormativity

          Also mainstream articles: https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/31/23579510/car-brain-motornormativity-study-ian-walker

          And a video by GCN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_4GZnGl55c

          I’m surprised that by being in the fuck cars community you never heard the term!

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          To explain it quickly: You know Heteronormativity, the fact that many people are hetero and assume others are too. This is a similar normativity. Many people (depends on where you live yadda yadda) always drive everywhere and never consider a world where cars are not their only/primary way to get around. They will fail to imagine cities where cars are not as important or common, because they associate transport=car. This is harmful, because cars are in fact very inefficient for most tasks and have pretty bad side effects such as taking tons of valuable space in a city or noise or pollution.

          • squaresinger
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            No need to explain. I just had to read the word a few times to separate the partial words and understand what was written.