This is supposedly a EV battery ejection system to make battery fires easier to control. Pedestrians and cyclists had best say goodbye to their lower legs.
Fits perfectly with the general “fuck everyone else” nature of cars.
Of certain car owners.
Cars and car culture in general really. The owners are usually lovely people but it’s their car that is polluting, getting in the way, injuring people, boiling the planet etc.
to be fair, car tailpipe pollution is the least of our concerns compared to the general production of garbage with total disregard to emissions.
it’s why EVs won’t really save us, but the car industry.
(you also forgot to mention the awful NOISE some of them subject us to, but i digress)
Removed by mod
Did you actually read what I wrote? Try reading it again. Keep re-reading it until you get the concept that I am not hating anyone.
Removed by mod
So the damage isn’t in hitting people, but the overall effect on society. Cars require buildings be more spread out to accommodate wider roads with less space for bikes, pedestrians, and mass transit. Parking spreads out buildings even more. This promotes isolated, insular individuals instead of an actual community. There is such a massive difference in human health due to the base level stress that comes from living in a car-centric hellscape many obese people lose weight despite eating more when they leave America.
Removed by mod
Chill the fuck out. Nobody here is blaming every individual for not waging a protracted peoples campaign against 4 wheeled vehicles, the start of this thread was ‘the general “fuck everyone else” nature of cars.’ due to the damaging effect they have on society
And fuck any of you fat asses trying to blame cars for your fat ass.
Once again, you’re looking at a systemic issue and blaming individuals. That might make you feel good, but it’s not useful for solving it.
Cars and car culture in general really. The owners are usually lovely people but it’s their car that is polluting, getting in the way, injuring people, boiling the planet etc.
Hey, I’m not involved in this conversation. Just wanted to let you know that you look like a huge idiot right now.
nope. of cars in general, at least in North America
too big, too offensive, too many resources
“Not all car owners”
/sj
deleted by creator
Just wait till the car gets hacked and some one starts remotely erecting batteries.
Erecting?
I sat here for a good two minutes trying to find something witty and funny to say Finally all I really want to do is tell you that you used the wrong word.
Could be worse.
In my job they send a copy of all the health and safety stuff to each employee once a year. Part of that is something about fire safety.
For some reason they didn’t send me the German original version but the English translation instead.
In there it says that the fire safety officer alone is responsible for all erections.
We had a good laugh.
If you dig far enough Into Osha saftey documentation, you’ll find a page where they advocate the use of a saftey wench.
Lots of work to do
Yeah stupid auto correct. I’m just leaving it
Ok but what was it meant to be? Ejecting?
Fuck it if the car can erect its own batteries I think it’s overengineered
Yea! Shoot the burning battery right under the fuel tanker in the lane next to you!
If this becomes common, eventually there will be a chain reaction on a crowded grid-locked freeway.
It will work something like this:
Oh the huge manatee!
Oh, I thought you were referring to the Ford Nucleon…
That might have been safer than the OP concept.
Tfw the car catch fire and you’re stepping out but the car yeet the problem right back at you
Stepping outk if it’s not a Tesla ;)
No. American drivers sit on the left side. This would only kill filthy passengers.
No.
Besides the fact that I hate this uppity way of saying no, the first commenter didn’t really say whether or not the driver was the one getting out.
Not that I’m disputing any of what you’re saying, but how is “No.” uppity?
If I had to take a guess, it’s about perceived tone. Connotation becomes extremely important in online discourse.
Rather than “No. Here is the rest of what I have to say,” I recommend “Nah, here is the rest of what I have to say.”
It’s a lot less forceful, more conversational.
The point make the no very harsh in my mental voice. "No. Because… " compared to “No, because…”
I dunno, like I just imagine someone saying it in real life and it’s either very uppity or very neckbeard, fedora, know-it-all-y. Like “um ackshually. No.”
That kind of vibe?
Like, the comment could’ve just started with the second sentence, without the “No.”, you know?
And that’s the only way you can read that?
It’s the way I read it. I’m just sharing my perspective, and that’s what I’m able to do. Diplomatic phrasing/tone isn’t something everyone can write fluently. 🤷♂️ The “No.” just had no place in there either, which is what set the tone. The message could’ve been delivered without the “No.”, because there was no question or statement, really. You see what I’m saying?
I do, but I’m not certain you do. It isn’t flattering.
“Uppity”. Youre just assuming I’m a frequent passenger or p########n.
I am not assuming you are anything. I’m not sure what that redacted word is supposed to be either. 😶
Ped. A fucking filthy ped. How dare you.
Pedestrian?
Wow you just said it, fully. Braver person than i.
My immediate thought was, why not use this to enable standardized quick-swappable batteries? Maybe not with quite as much ejection force though.
My first thought when it popped out the side of the car was “I wonder if I could surf that battery across the road…”
This seems like it would solve any issues with range as well. Instead of stopping for hours to recharge you could just swap the battery (for a small fee).
Was my problem, now it’s your problem. It’s called hot potato.
Good luck ejecting a spicy pillow(it’ll probably get stuck in place)
I’m picturing a crew of emergency responders approaching. They all get taken out “in the name of safety”, and the rest decide to vote with the legs they still have and refuse to approach
RIP first responders.
I thought this was antitheft at first lmao.
Imagine trying to steal a car and it just sweeps your legs.
Somewhere in a Vega’s parking lot… Pop! Poppop! Pop pop! Pop pop pop! Pop! Pop!
Pop pop pop pop pop!
Pop pop!What happens if the frame gets bent in a wreck? I guess you’re probably not any worse off than you are currently in a wreck with an EV, but it seems a little silly to make this rely on the car not getting too crumpled during a car wreck to work.
“a little silly”, is a very kind way to describe it
this can’t go wrong.
a scared person hurting someone innocent? inconceivable with this device
That’s a total non starter. There is zero chance this ever gets implemented.
