Donald Trump has continually insisted that deals over his tariffs are coming.

Donald Trump claimed Tuesday that the U.S. doesn’t “have to sign” any trade deals, inadvertently admitting that his administration hasn’t made any progress during the 90-day pause on his disastrous tariffs.

During a tense meeting to discuss tariffs with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, the president attempted to move the goal posts on actually completing any agreements with foreign countries.

“Everyone says, ‘When, when, when, are you going to sign deals?’ We don’t have to sign deals!” Trump said.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “We don’t have to sign deals. They have to sign deals with us. They want a piece of our market, we don’t want a piece of their market. We don’t care about their market. They want a piece of our market,” Trump rambled.

    “Trump rambled” is the best attribution for trump quotes.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 months ago

    Last month, Trump claimed to have already struck 200 trade agreements with foreign countries, a remark so outlandish it sent members of his administration scrambling to make it make sense. (There are also only 195 countries in the world.)

    The vile foreigner swine must have pulled out of all of them over the past month.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can direct your investments in your 401k to international funds much more easily

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes, you’re not not going to have any foreign tax obligations owning a mutual fund in your 401k

            • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              True, and as long as expense ratios are the same or lower than your US index/mutual fund then your only real issue is if the US market rebounds and outperforms your portfolio if you had diversified more.

              And the expense ratio’s can vary a lot. For example Fidelity shows the exp. ratio of ($0.08 per $1,000) 0.008% for their Index Equity Fund, where their International Equity Fund has an exp. ratio of ($4.02 per $1,000) 0.402%.

              Even small differences in fees can have a huge effect over time. Say you’ve invested $100,000 at a 7% annual return: A fund with a 0.80% expense ratio could eat up $70,000 more of your returns over 30 years than a fund with a 0.40% expense ratio.

              Source: How to Invest Your 401(k) and Best 401(k) Investments

              • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago
                Fund Name Ticker Net Expense Ratio
                American Funds New Perspective R62 RNPGX 0.41%
                American Funds New World R62 RNWGX 0.57%
                iShares MSCI EAFE International Index K BTMKX 0.05%
                Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N HFQRX 0.70%
                Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Adm VEMAX 0.13%
                Capital Group EuroPacific Growth SA N/A 0.41%
    • rabber@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Doesn’t matter the currency will be worthless too

      Pull 401k and buy a tangible object

    • SpaceNoodle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is stupid. Selling your investments at a low price for a currency that’s quickly devaluing is two boneheaded moves in one.

      Move as many of your investments as possible outside of the US.

        • aesthelete
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Every currency devalues, that’s what inflation is.

        • SpaceNoodle
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Donald Trump is president of the EU? I missed that news.

            • SpaceNoodle
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes, if the US entirely and completely ceased to function, it would have a greater economic effect than the current recession that has begun.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately, the global economic system is tightly integrated. I think this will provide only a minor hedging effect.

      • SpaceNoodle
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        As the rest of the world continues to move on without the US, the effect will grow.

        • Dozzi92
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          The US consumers base is bigger than the next like six or seven countries combined, China included. If a country exports literally anything, you can bet the US is one of their larger trade partners, if not the largest. We just love buying shit here and had the money to do it. So I’m just saying, this shit is gonna hurt everybody. If you build something, odds are someone in America will buy it. The US imported $3.2T worth of goods in 2022, and if that shit dries up, all those places need to find someone else to sell that shit to.

          I say this thinking this is all dumb, and if the issue was China, as it’s purported to be, and which is something I can totally get on board with, why not just go to trade war with China? China is heavily reliant on American consumerism. The US sent 150b in goods to China, but bought 536b back. With no other of America’s trade partners is the gulf so big. Mexico and Canada combined, the next largest two, were less.

          I dunno, I’m just an idiot. I think things are much more complicated than folks on here and Reddit make them out to be. And that’s excluding the plethora of other obvious negatives from this administration. I think we all need to buckle up, and it doesn’t matter where you’re from.

          • chilicheeselies
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Its big becauae people consume. How many people gonna consume when its tonexpensive to live?

  • Vari@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    3 months ago

    How many MAGA folks will ever see this? Probably very few. And most of those few will dismiss it without a second thought.

      • Glitterbomb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hey now, he eventually back pedaled and successfully redirected the hurricane by using just a sharpie.

      • JLock17
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I wish he did so people would realize how much of an idiot he is. But then again, this is Maga.

  • Treczoks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, we all know how incapable Trump is regarding business and economy. Basically any halfway professional diplomat or trade official will basically run him into the next wall, head first.

    China is only the first of many countries where he will learn that he is playing with adults for the first time. These are not random bootlicking apprentices he can fire at a whim.

  • jerryh100
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Made deal with 200 nations? Yeah, imagiNations.

    • Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wakanda, Narnia, Atlantis, Mordor, New Crobuzon, Dis, Sodom & Gomora, flavortown, that isle where all gay man live, the underworld and belgium.

  • kamenLady.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wherever he appears, everyone should just break out in laughter.

      • Hayduke
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you are aiming for offensive, “Dotard” is a (far) better word and it’s not actually as derogatory as it sounds. In fact, it’s perfectly cromulent and accurate.

        1. an old person, especially one who has become physically weak or whose mental faculties have declined.
  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If we could get someone Trump listens to saying that the United States is falling behind Norway in dilithium mining, and state it confidently, he would 100% be demanding Norway’s dilithium operations the next day.

    We should find a way to do this.

  • opus86@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m really hoping that after enough people yell at him about how much money they are losing, he will just drop the tariffs and wonder off to the next disaster.

  • Jack_Burton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    He also brought in 9, maybe even 10 trillion dollars to the US! No other president has even brought in 1 trillion! Did you know that?

    I really wish the camera didn’t keep focusing on Trump, I wanted to see Carney’s reactions throughout.